Did you know:
Continue reading to find out more about the simple tools that will reduce your energy consumption. While becoming more energy efficient to help solve the problem of global warming, you will also save money on your natural gas and electric bills.
You will need to have your utility bills, information about your automobile usage and other information handy when you provide answers to the questions on the CO2 calculator webpage. The webpage will tell you what information you will need to gather.
The typical American household generates 55,000 pounds of carbon dioxide annually. By contrast, the typical German household contributes 27,000 pounds and the average Swedish household's contribution is only 15,000 pounds.
According to the Energy Information Administration, U.S. households account for 21% of all the energy consumed in the U.S. annually and directly account for roughly the same amount (21%) of the U.S.'s annual carbon dioxide emissions. Taken collectively, US households directly produce about 8% of the planet's carbon dioxide emissions, and through our purchases we are indirectly responsible for another 17%.
Clearly, we have much room for improvement. As David Gershon stated, “If the bad news is that individual Americans are a major part of the problem, the good news is that we can also be a major part of the solution. By making specific, targeted changes to actions we already take every day, we can significantly reduce our CO2 emissions.”
No doubt large-scale solutions, such as switching to cleaner energy sources, are necessary to address global warming, and government and industry each have crucial roles to play. But individuals likewise play a crucial role, and small adjustments in our daily habits can have a positive, and significant, impact toward solving the problem of global warming.
For example, according to the Alliance to Save Energy, if every U.S. household replaced just one incandescent light bulb with a compact fluorescent light (CFL) bulb, it would save enough energy to light more than 8 million homes and save over $900 million in utility bills.
You can implement many of the following energy conservation measures yourself. Others may require the expertise of a licensed professional. Always read product information and instructions before beginning a project, and, when in doubt or when recommended, consult with a licensed professional.
RecycleIn 2005, U.S. residents, businesses, and institutions produced more than 245 million tons of garbage, which is approximately 4.5 pounds of waste per person per day. That is up from 2.7 pounds per person per day in just the last 35 years. When you consider the energy used to transport waste to the landfill and the landfill gases that escape into the atmosphere, each pound of waste we create generates roughly 1.5 pounds of greenhouse gases. Recycling half of all household-generated waste can reduce your CO2 footprint by 2400 pounds per year.Learn more... |
Reduce your hot water usageReducing the amount of hot water you use can result in significant reductions in energy usage, saving you money and further reducing your CO2 footprint. "A family of four each showering five minutes a day can use about 700 gallons per week—a three-year drinking water supply for one person! Water-conserving showerheads and faucet aerators can cut hot water use in half. That family of four can save 14,000 gallons of water a year and the energy required to heat it."Learn more... |
|
Reduce the water used for dishwashingA common misconception is that washing dishes by hand saves hot water. In reality, washing dishes by hand several times a day can be more expensive than operating an energy-efficient dishwasher, especially if you only operate it with full loads.Learn more... |
Wash and dry your clothes more efficientlyAbout 90% of the energy used for washing clothes is for heating the water. Using less water and using cooler water are two ways to reduce the amount of energy used for washing clothes. Typical electric clothes washers and dryers generate 5 pounds of CO2 per washer/dryer cycle. In most cases, washing clothes in cold water gets them just as clean as washing them in warm or hot water, and the CO2 savings are substantial – about 2 pounds per load. You can further reduce the amount of energy used for washing clothes by purchasing a new, front-loading machine.Learn more... |
|
Turn down the thermostatThe average household will spend almost $2,100 on home energy costs in 2007. Of a typical residence's total energy consumption, heating accounts for the largest portion, representing almost 50% of a household's annual energy bill.Learn more... |
Drive smarter"U.S. residents drive an average of 10,000 miles per year per capita – for every adult, teenager, and toddler. For a car that gets 20 mpg, each mile driven is equivalent to a pound of CO2, which means the emissions add up fast." Making minor changes in your driving habits can improve your car's mileage per gallon, cutting global warming pollution and saving you anywhere from $200 to $500 each year.Learn more... |
|
Buy localAnyone who longs for summer and the unbeatable taste of a home-grown tomato already knows the value of buying locally. Simply put, locally grown produce tastes better. It's also fresher, as most produce in the U.S. is picked 4 to 7 days before making it to the supermarket shelf, and is shipped an average of 1500 miles before being sold. "And this is when taking into account only US grown products! Those distances are substantially longer [7 to 14 days] when we take into consideration produce imported from Mexico, Asia, Canada, South America, and other places."Learn more... |
In 2005, U.S. residents, businesses, and institutions produced more than 245 million tons of garbage, which is approximately 4.5 pounds of waste per person per day. That is up from 2.7 pounds per person per day in just the last 35 years. When you consider the energy used to transport waste to the landfill and the landfill gases that escape into the atmosphere, each pound of waste we create generates roughly 1.5 pounds of greenhouse gases. Recycling half of all household-generated waste can reduce your CO2 footprint by 2400 pounds per year.
Most everyone has heard the phrase "reduce, reuse and recycle." This advertising campaign captures the main components of a strategy aimed at reducing the amount of waste we generate.
Reducing or preventing waste means consuming and throwing away less. It includes purchasing durable, long-lasting goods, seeking environmentally friendly (non-toxic) products and packaging, and redesigning products to use less raw material in production, have a longer life, or be used again after their original use. By reducing waste, we prevent greenhouse gas emissions, reduce pollutants, save energy, conserve resources, and reduce the need for new landfills and combustors.
Reusing items also reduces waste, and not just by preventing an item from being thrown away. Waste is generated throughout the life cycle of a product, from extracting the raw materials, transporting them to processing facilities, and manufacturing them for use as a finished product. Repairing items that are broken, donating unwanted items, or selling them saves energy and raw materials used to make a new replacement. It also saves money. Examples for reusing every-day items include refilling bottles, using cloth napkins and towels, and using ceramic coffee mugs.
Recycling converts used materials into valuable resources, preventing them from contributing to landfill waste. Recycling is one of the best environmental success stories of the late 20th century. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), recycling diverted 79 million tons of material away from landfills and incinerators in 2005, up from 34 million tons in 1990. By 2002, almost 9,000 curbside collection programs served roughly half of the American population. Curbside programs, along with drop-off and buy-back centers, resulted in a diversion of about 32 percent of the nation's solid waste in 2005.
Composting is another form of recycling, in which food and yard waste is converted into humus, a soil-like material, which can be used in gardens, landscaping and other applications. "Yard trimmings and food residuals together constitute 24 percent of the U.S. municipal solid waste stream. That’s a lot of waste to send to landfills when it could become useful and environmentally beneficial compost instead! Composting keeps organic wastes out of landfills, provides nutrients for the soil, protects soils from erosion and reduces the need for fertilizers and pesticides.
"By recycling, you can make a positive impact on our planet and reduce the amount you throw away. Last year, Indianapolis citizens recycled over 28 million pounds of recyclable items. By recycling, we conserve natural resources, prevent and reduce pollution, save energy, create jobs and stimulate the development of greener technologies."
Reducing the amount of hot water you use can result in significant reductions in energy usage, saving you money and further reducing your CO2 footprint. "A family of four each showering five minutes a day can use about 700 gallons per week—a three-year drinking water supply for one person! Water-conserving showerheads and faucet aerators can cut hot water use in half. That family of four can save 14,000 gallons of water a year and the energy required to heat it."
Heating hot water for a 10-minute shower can generate as much as 4 pounds of CO2. By staying in the shower for 5 minutes instead of 10 and ensuring that you have a low-flow showerhead, you can have a pleasurable shower and annually save several hundred pounds of CO2. As for baths, they can use up to twice the amount of hot water you need for a 5-minute shower.
Turning the water off when you are soaping up, shaving or brushing your teeth saves money not only by reducing the amount of water you are using, but by reducing the gas or electricity needed to heat the water. It is yet another step you can take to reduce your CO2 footprint.
Installing a low-flow showerhead can greatly reduce the amount of water, and hence CO2 produced in heating the water, you use when showering. Installing low-flow showerheads to use less hot water can provide reductions in CO2 of 350 pounds per year.
In the case of kitchen and bathroom faucets, aerators, the screw-on tips, restrict the flow rate of the faucet. Aerators are inexpensive to replace and are one of the most cost-effective water conservation measures.
A common misconception is that washing dishes by hand saves hot water. In reality, washing dishes by hand several times a day can be more expensive than operating an energy-efficient dishwasher, especially if you only operate it with full loads.
About 90% of the energy used for washing clothes is for heating the water. Using less water and using cooler water are two ways to reduce the amount of energy used for washing clothes. Typical electric clothes washers and dryers generate 5 pounds of CO2 per washer/dryer cycle. In most cases, washing clothes in cold water gets them just as clean as washing them in warm or hot water, and the CO2 savings are substantial – about 2 pounds per load. You can further reduce the amount of energy used for washing clothes by purchasing a new, front-loading machine.
The average household will spend almost $2,100 on home energy costs in 2007. Of a typical residence's total energy consumption, heating accounts for the largest portion, representing almost 50% of a household's annual energy bill.
"U.S. residents drive an average of 10,000 miles per year per capita – for every adult, teenager, and toddler. For a car that gets 20 mpg, each mile driven is equivalent to a pound of CO2, which means the emissions add up fast." Making minor changes in your driving habits can improve your car's mileage per gallon, cutting global warming pollution and saving you anywhere from $200 to $500 each year.
Anyone who longs for summer and the unbeatable taste of a home-grown tomato already knows the value of buying locally. Simply put, locally grown produce tastes better. It's also fresher, as most produce in the U.S. is picked 4 to 7 days before making it to the supermarket shelf, and is shipped an average of 1500 miles before being sold. "And this is when taking into account only US grown products! Those distances are substantially longer [7 to 14 days] when we take into consideration produce imported from Mexico, Asia, Canada, South America, and other places."
"The concept of buying local is simply to buy food (or any good or service) produced, grown, or raised as close to your home as possible. With industrialization, our food is now grown and processed in fewer and fewer locations, meaning it has to travel further to reach the average consumer's refrigerator. Although this method of production is considered efficient and economically profitable for large agribusiness corporations, it is harmful to the environment, consumers and rural communities."
In 2005, the typical U.S. family spent close to $1,500 a year on home utility bills. In 2007, the average household will spend about $2,100 on home energy costs. "U.S. households produce 21 percent of the country’s global warming pollution. That’s more pollution than the entire heat-trapping output of the United Kingdom. The good news is that energy-conscious families can reduce their emissions by up to two-thirds. If every household in the U.S. made energy-efficient choices, we could save 800 million tons of global warming pollution – more than the heat-trapping emissions from over 100 countries. That would go a long way toward stabilizing our climate."
There are a number of measures you can take to make your household systems more energy-efficient and significantly reduce your carbon dioxide footprint. Improvements to your household systems include maintaining and upgrading your heating and cooling equipment, making your hot water heater more efficient, installing energy efficient lights, sealing air leaks, replacing aging appliances with new, more energy-efficient models, and other measures that make up a "whole-house" energy efficiency plan.
A whole-house approach requires you to view your home as an energy system with interdependent parts. For example, your heating system is more than just the furnace. It includes the network of ducts that deliver heat throughout your home. Installing an energy-efficient furnace will not provide the energy cost-savings you expect if the ducts, walls, attic, windows and doors are not properly insulated. Taking a whole-house approach to saving energy ensures that dollars you invest to save energy are spent wisely.
Start with an energy auditThe first step to taking a whole-house energy efficiency approach is to find out which parts of your house or apartment use the most energy. A home energy audit will identify those areas, and through your own efforts, your local utility, or the assistance of a qualified professional, you can take cost-effective measures to reduce your energy costs and hence, your CO2 footprint.Learn more... |
Maintain and upgrade your heating and cooling equipmentMore energy dollars go towards your heating and cooling system than any other system in your home. "Typically, 56% of your utility bill goes for heating and cooling. What’s more, heating and cooling systems in the United States together emit over a half billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year, adding to global warming. They also generate about 24% of the nation’s sulfur dioxide and 12% of the nitrogen oxides, the chief ingredients in acid rain."Learn more... |
|
Make your hot water heater more efficientAfter household heating and cooling, water heating is the largest energy user in your home, representing over 13% of your annual energy bill, and a significant contributor to household CO2 emissions. "If your water heater is more than 10 years old it is likely running at less than 50 percent efficiency—wasting energy and money—but most people don’t replace their water heater until it fails. Upgrading to a new, more efficient model will lower not only your monthly expenses, but also your contribution to air pollution and global warming." Even if you don’t plan on buying a new water heater in the near future, there are a number of measures you can take now to save money, and energy, with your existing system.Learn more... |
Replace inefficient bulbs and fixtures with energy efficient lightsLighting is the third largest energy user in your home, representing approximately 10% of your annual energy bill. "Making improvements to your lighting is one of the fastest ways to cut your energy bills. . . . Using new lighting technologies can reduce lighting energy use in your home by 50% to 75%. Advances in lighting controls offer further energy savings by reducing the amount of time lights are on but not being used."Learn more... |
|
Seal air leaks"Heat naturally flows from warmer spaces to cooler ones until the temperatures both in and between the two spaces are equal. Inside the home, warm air rises and leaks out the attic and roof while drawing cold air in through the basement. Your home’s shell (walls, windows, doors, foundation, roof, attic, etc.) determines its rate of heat loss, and leaky shells can be responsible for 25-40 percent of the load on your heating system. You can prevent this heat loss by implementing passive heating measures such as improving insulation, sealing air leaks, and replacing or reglazing your windows to minimize heat transfer."Learn more... |
Replace older appliances with energy-efficient modelsAppliances such as your refrigerator, clothes washer and dryer, dishwasher and electronics (TV, computer, audio and video systems, etc.) account for about 20% of your household’s annual energy bill. "Together, these items account for nearly eight tons of heat-trapping emissions per household per year."Learn more... |
|
Install energy-efficient windowsAlmost half of all homes in the U.S. have inefficient, single-pane windows. Inefficient windows can account for up to 25% of your heating bill in the winter, and can make your air conditioner work up to three times harder in the summer. Although high performance windows may cost more initially, they save you money in the long run. In addition, they increase the value of your home.Learn more... |
Switch to "green" powerMore and more states are adopting renewable portfolio standards (RPS), also known as renewable electricity standards (RES). These standards require utilities to provide increasing amounts of electricity to consumers from renewable energy resources, like wind, solar and biomass. Congress is now considering passage of a national RPS, and it is only a matter of time before our energy policy shifts from over-reliance on coal, and the harmful effects of CO2 and other toxic air emissions, to investments that increase energy efficiency in homes, businesses and industry, and that develop the full potential of renewable energy resources, which produce little or no emissions and which, unlike fossil fuels, are limitless in supply.Learn more... |
The first step to taking a whole-house energy efficiency approach is to find out which parts of your house or apartment use the most energy. A home energy audit will identify those areas, and through your own efforts, your local utility, or the assistance of a qualified professional, you can take cost-effective measures to reduce your energy costs and hence, your CO2 footprint.
"Retrofitting a home for energy efficiency will save you money, lots of money. However, it will require some effort on your part. You should start with an energy audit. First, do a simple visual inspection to locate the most obvious leaks – gaps between doors and frames, or large openings in the building envelope that let cold air in when the wind’s blowing and hot air out when the furnace is running. These can be sealed immediately and will often yield enormous benefits. Then, on a windy day, perform a search and destroy mission for smaller, less obvious leaks. Use incense, a smoke stick or simply your hand to detect drafts . . . . If this is more work than you’d like to undertake, or if you are feeling uncertain, you can always hire a qualified professional energy auditor to perform the inspection for you. You’ll find them in the business pages under 'Energy Conservation and Management Services' or 'Home Inspection.'"
References:
More energy dollars go towards your heating and cooling system than any other system in your home. "Typically, 56% of your utility bill goes for heating and cooling. What’s more, heating and cooling systems in the United States together emit over a half billion tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year, adding to global warming. They also generate about 24% of the nation’s sulfur dioxide and 12% of the nitrogen oxides, the chief ingredients in acid rain."
"One of the most important things you can do to save energy is to regularly tune up your furnace. Up to 50% of the energy you use in your home goes to heating it. And a heating system can waste up to 50% of the energy it uses if it’s not operating efficiently. This can represent as much as 3,750 pounds of CO2 wastefully going into the air each year."
There are a number of things you can do to improve the efficiency and life of your heating system:
Other heating and cooling tips include:
In the case of room air conditioners, it is important to install a properly sized unit for the area being cooled. An air conditioner that is too big will actually perform less efficiently because room units are most effective when they run for relatively long periods of time instead of continually switching off and on. Longer run times allow air conditioners to maintain a more constant room temperature and remove excess humidity.
If your in the market for a new air conditioner, be sure to shop for an energy-efficient model. New, more energy-efficient air conditioners can save you up to 50% on your utility bill for cooling. Look for the ENERGY STAR and EnergyGuide labels.
Even if you are not in the market for a new air conditioner, there are several things you can do to increase your energy efficiency, save money and reduce your CO2 footprint:
Programmable thermostats can also help you save money and energy. "You can save as much as 10% a year on your heating and cooling bills by simply turning your thermostat back 10% to 15% for 8 hours. You can do this automatically without sacrificing comfort by installing an automatic setback or programmable thermostat."
Smart landscaping is yet another way to keep your home cool in the summer, warm in the winter and reduce your energy bills. "Carefully positioned trees can save up to 25% of a typical household’s energy used for heating and cooling. . . . [J]ust three trees, properly placed around the house, can save an average household between $100 and $250 in heating and cooling energy costs annually." Planting trees also helps to further reduce your carbon dioxide footprint, as a single tree will absorb roughly one ton of carbon dioxide over its lifetime.
If you are upgrading your heating and cooling system, select energy-efficient products. Look for the ENERGY STAR and EnergyGuide labels.
When upgrading, consider newer technologies, including geothermal heat pumps. Heat pumps are the most efficient form of electric heating in moderate climates, providing three times more heating than the equivalent amount of energy they consume in electricity. Heat pumps collect heat from the air, water or ground outside your home and concentrate it for use inside.
"In winter, a heat pump removes heat from the outside air and transfers it inside the home. In summer the processed is reversed. Heat pumps are an economical and energy-efficient way to provide space heating and cooling. . . . According to the EPA, geothermal heat pumps can save the average homeowner 30-70 percent in heating costs and 20-50 percent in cooling costs. This could save some homeowners up to $400 per year or more."
Geothermal systems should likewise be considered when upgrading your heating and cooling system. Geothermal systems provide the greatest energy savings in climates that have extreme heating and cooling loads and generate high energy bills. Geothermal systems are more expensive to install than other central heating options, but over time will save you money and help to reduce your CO2 footprint.
Solar power is yet another option that is rapidly gaining momentum in the United States. Incorporating a passive solar system, where the sun helps heat the house in cold weather and is shaded from the house in warm weather, into new or existing home design, can greatly reduce your heating and cooling costs. Unlike solar panels, which can require a large initial investment of money and time, designing a passive solar system can be surprisingly simple and inexpensive.
"In contrast to passive solar systems, active solar systems use supplemental electrical equipment, such as pumps and fans, to move heat around your home. In an active system, solar collectors harvest the sun’s energy to heat either liquid or air that is then pumped or blow through pipes or ducts to your living space. . . . Active solar heating systems are good choices in climates that have long heating seasons with high proportions of sunny days and above average fuel prices."
Rapid advances in solar-powered systems are revolutionizing the technology and increasing the ability of homeowners to generate "home-grown" electric power. "Installing clean, reliable, inflation-proof solar power is easier than ever, thanks to the invention of thin-film photovoltaic (PV) laminates that can be bonded directly onto metal roofing panels. Unlike crystalline PV material, there’s no need for obtrusive racks and heavy, expensive glass. Instead, unbreakable thin-film PV is produced using amorphous silicon, encapsulated in Teflon and other polymers."
After household heating and cooling, water heating is the largest energy user in your home, representing over 13% of your annual energy bill, and a significant contributor to household CO2 emissions. "If your water heater is more than 10 years old it is likely running at less than 50 percent efficiency—wasting energy and money—but most people don’t replace their water heater until it fails. Upgrading to a new, more efficient model will lower not only your monthly expenses, but also your contribution to air pollution and global warming." Even if you don’t plan on buying a new water heater in the near future, there are a number of measures you can take now to save money, and energy, with your existing system.
The biggest savings can be achieved by simply using less hot water. Not only does it save you money while reducing your CO2 footprint, cutting down on water conserves our water supplies. "A family of four each showering five minutes a day can use about 700 gallons per week—a three-year drinking water supply for one person! Water-conserving showerheads and faucet aerators can cut hot water use in half. That family of four can save 14,000 gallons of water a year and the energy required to heat it."
If your water heater was installed before 2004, consider installing an insulating jacket on your existing water heater. Insulation jackets are inexpensive and easy to install, and are particularly effective if your water heater is located in an unheated space such as a basement. "The insulating jacket will reduce standby heat loss—heat lost through the walls of the tank—by 25–40%, saving 4–9% on your water heating bills." Many newer water heaters already come well insulated, making it unnecessary to install an insulating jacket in terms of any additional economic benefit. In fact, some manufacturers recommend against installing insulating jackets on their energy-efficient models. Always follow the manufacturer’s recommendations, and be careful not to restrict air inlets when insulating conventional gas or oil-fired water heaters.
Insulating your hot water pipes will also reduce heat loss and save you money. Not only does it reduce losses as hot water flows from your water heater to your faucet, insulating your hot water pipes also reduces standby losses when the tap is turned off and then back on in within an hour or so. "A great deal of energy and water is wasted waiting for the hot water to reach the tap. Even when pipes are insulated, the water in the pipes will eventually cool, but it stays warmer much longer than it would if the pipes weren’t insulated."
Turn down the thermostat on your hot water heater. A lot of energy, and money, is wasted simply by setting your thermostat too high on your water heater. "For most households, 120°F water is fine (about midway between the 'low' and 'medium' setting). Each 10°F reduction in water temperature will generally save 3–5% on your water heating costs. When you are going away on vacation, you can turn the thermostat down to the lowest possible setting, or turn the water heater off altogether for additional savings. With a gas water heater, make sure you know how to relight the pilot if you’re going to turn it off while away."
If you are in the market for a new hot water heater, there are several energy-efficient models that you can choose from to meet your needs and budget. They include:
Tankless water heaters – also known as on-demand or instantaneous heaters. They use energy only when hot water is needed, resulting in less standby energy loss than storage heaters. "They tend to have a higher up-front cost, but are less expensive to operate in the long term due to their higher efficiency." "Researchers have found savings can be as much as 34% compared with a standard electric storage tank water heater."
Other tips for conserving energy include:
Lighting is the third largest energy user in your home, representing approximately 10% of your annual energy bill. "Making improvements to your lighting is one of the fastest ways to cut your energy bills. . . . Using new lighting technologies can reduce lighting energy use in your home by 50% to 75%. Advances in lighting controls offer further energy savings by reducing the amount of time lights are on but not being used."
"Lighting is responsible for using about a fourth of all electricity consumed in the United States, of which 20 percent goes to extra air conditioning to remove unwanted heat (from lighting). In fact, more than 90 percent of the energy consumed by a standard incandescent bulb is given off as heat, while only 10 percent is converted into light!"
Light-emitting diode (LED) technology has even more potential for energy savings and longevity. LEDs are already standard usage in products such as headlamps, cell phones, bicycle lights, and Christmas lights. "Modern LEDs have the potential to last ten times longer than CFLs, depending on the type of application, the type of LED, and the product in which they’re used – some LED table lamps use only 5 watts."
Halogen lamps, while less efficient that LEDs or CFLs, are still up to 50% more efficient than a standard incandescent lamp. Halogen bulbs cost more than standard incandescents but last twice as long, making them a cost-effective investment over time.
Additional tips for energy-efficient lighting include turning off lights in any room you’re not using, installing timers, photo cells or occupancy sensors to reduce the amount of time your lights are on, using task lighting instead of lighting an entire room, and taking advantage of natural daylight to further reduce your energy use and therefore your carbon dioxide footprint.
Another important point is before installing a CFL in a dimmer-controlled fixture, be sure it is designed for that purpose. Additionally, turning a CFL on and off frequently can shorten its life. "To take full advantage of the energy savings and long life of ENERGY STAR qualified CFLs, it is best to use them in light fixtures you use the most and are on for at least 15 minutes at a time. Good locations include outdoor light fixtures, indoor fixtures in the living room, family room, kitchen, bedroom, recreation room, etc. This is not to say you should leave your lights on all day if you use ENERGY STAR qualified CFLs. It is still a good habit to turn the lights off when you leave the room for an extended period of time."
"Heat naturally flows from warmer spaces to cooler ones until the temperatures both in and between the two spaces are equal. Inside the home, warm air rises and leaks out the attic and roof while drawing cold air in through the basement. Your home’s shell (walls, windows, doors, foundation, roof, attic, etc.) determines its rate of heat loss, and leaky shells can be responsible for 25-40 percent of the load on your heating system. You can prevent this heat loss by implementing passive heating measures such as improving insulation, sealing air leaks, and replacing or reglazing your windows to minimize heat transfer."
"Air leaks around doors, windows, and electrical outlets; through the fireplace; in basements (between the foundation and the frame); and especially in attics lose as much heat, in the typical home, as leaving an average-size window open all winter long. The extra heating fuel required to compensate for these energy leaks represents up to 800 pounds of CO2 emissions annually."
Making sure your home is properly insulated is one of the easiest and most cost-effective ways to reduce energy waste, save money and reduce your carbon dioxide footprint. "You can increase the comfort of your home while reducing your heating and cooling needs by up to 30% by investing just a few hundred dollars in proper insulation and sealing air leaks."
Insulation can be made from a variety of materials. Four main types of insulation include:
Adding insulation to your attic is one of the easiest and most cost-effective ways to make your home more comfortable year-round. "To find out if you have enough attic insulation, measure the thickness of the insulation. If it is less than R-22 (7 inches of fiber glass or rock wool or 6 inches of cellulose), you could probably benefit by adding more. Most U.S. homes should have between R-22 and R-49 insulation in the attic."
New products on today’s market provide both insulation and structural support, and should be considered for new home construction or additions. "Structural insulated panels, known as SIPS, and masonry products like insulating concrete forms are among these."
An old building technique that is regaining popularity is straw bale construction. Straw bale homes are constructed by stacking rectangular bales of straw and covering them with a plaster shell. "Straw bale walls are at least twice efficient as those from conventional stick-frame construction and will save you money on heating and cooling bills."
According to the DOE, only 20% of homes built before 1980 are well insulated. Accordingly, adding insulation may be the best way to improve your home’s energy efficiency. It can create a more uniform temperature year round, muffle sound from outside, save on your energy bills and help to further reduce your CO2 footprint.
Appliances such as your refrigerator, clothes washer and dryer, dishwasher and electronics (TV, computer, audio and video systems, etc.) account for about 20% of your household’s annual energy bill. "Together, these items account for nearly eight tons of heat-trapping emissions per household per year."
When shopping for a new appliance, look for the ENERGY STAR label. ENERGY STAR products usually exceed minimum federal standards by a substantial amount. The ENERGY STAR label should not be confused with the bright yellow and black EnergyGuide label – the federal government requires this label to be displayed on most new appliances, and the label provides information about the energy efficiency of a particular appliance. Although these labels will not tell you which appliance is the most efficient, they will tell you the annual energy consumption and operating cost for each appliance so you can compare them yourself. The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy lists the energy performance of top-rated energy-saving appliances on its web site: http://www.aceee.org/.
Replacing older appliances with new, energy-efficient models can provide substantial reductions in both your energy costs and your CO2 footprint. "Replacing a dishwasher manufactured before 1994 with an ENERGY STAR dishwasher can save you more than $25 a year in electric or natural gas costs." A dishwasher with an ENERGY STAR label uses up to 25% less energy than required by federal standards.
"The EnergyGuide label on new refrigerators will tell you how much electricity in kilowatt-hours (kWh) a particular model uses in one year. The smaller the number, the less energy the refrigerator uses and the less it will cost you to operate. In addition to the EnergyGuide label, don’t forget to look for the ENERGY STAR label. A new refrigerator with an ENERGY STAR label uses at least 15% less energy than required by current federal standards and 40% less energy than the conventional models sold in 2001."
Other refrigerator tips include:
Substantial cost and energy savings can also be realized in the area of a home office and home electronics. An increasing number of people work from home on a regular or periodic basis. Working from home greatly reduces the CO2 footprint caused by driving or commuting to work. However, it could cause a substantial increase in your home energy bills unless you invest in or use energy-saving office equipment.
"ENERGY STAR office equipment is widely available: it provides users with dramatic savings, as much as 90% savings for some products. Overall, ENERGY STAR office products use about half the electricity of standard equipment. Along with saving energy directly, this equipment can reduce air-conditioning loads, noise from fans and transformers, and electromagnetic field emissions from monitors."
A substantial amount of energy, and hence cost, is wasted by leaving appliances on when not in use. "Common misconceptions sometimes account for the failure to turn off equipment. Many people believe that equipment lasts longer if it is never turned off. This incorrect perception carries over from the days of older mainframe computers. . . . There is a common misconception that screen savers reduce energy use by monitor; they do not. Automatic switching to sleep mode or manually turning monitors off is always the better energy-saving strategy."
Wasting power by leaving home electronics on when not using them is costly and needlessly increases your carbon dioxide footprint. In addition, many appliances continue to draw power even when they are switched off; so-called "phantom" loads, which can be found in items such as VCRs, TVs, stereos, computers, and kitchen appliances.
"In the average home, 75% of the electricity used to power home electronics is consumed while the products are turned off." "Add that all up, and it equals the annual output of 17 power plants, the government says." A good solution to this problem is plugging appliances into a power strip and using the switch on the power strip to cut all power to the appliance.
If you choose to leave home electronics on for periods of time, products that idle in a reduced power mode are preferable to those that do not, but even those products can waste significant amounts of energy. "Products that idle in what the industry calls low-power mode, or lopomo, consumed about 10 percent of total electricity in California homes, according to a 2002 study prepared for the California Energy Commission by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory."
Almost half of all homes in the U.S. have inefficient, single-pane windows. Inefficient windows can account for up to 25% of your heating bill in the winter, and can make your air conditioner work up to three times harder in the summer. Although high performance windows may cost more initially, they save you money in the long run. In addition, they increase the value of your home.
If you are shopping for new windows, look for the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC) label. The NFRC provides information for windows and skylights similar to fuel economy ratings on new cars, allowing you to compare the energy ratings of various windows. An NFRC label means the window’s performance is certified.
Window rating systems help you evaluate three main factors that affect the energy efficiency of windows. "The first is heat flow through the glass and frame, which is generated by the temperature difference between the inside of your home and the outside environment. . . . Heat transferred through a window is expressed with U-values; the lower the U-value, the better. The resistance to heat flow is expressed as an R-value. . . In general, the higher the R-value, the better the insulation."
Higher R-values are achieved with multiple panes of glass. Double-pane windows insulate almost twice as well as single-pane windows. In a double-pane window, the air space between the panes of glass provides insulation, reducing the amount of hot or cold air being conducted from one side of the window to the other.
The second major factor affecting a window’s energy efficiency is solar gain, also called the solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC). "Put simply, the SHGC measures how much of the sun’s energy (both visible and near-infrared light) striking the window transmits as heat into the room. . . . The SHGC also measures how much solar heat passes through the frame, not just the glass."
"The third factor that affects a window’s energy efficiency is air leakage. This is the air that flows through cracks between the sash and the frame, or at the point where the window connects to the wall. The lower the leakage value, the better."
Low-emissivity, or low-e, coatings have revolutionized window technology over the last three decades. "Thin, transparent coatings of silver or tin oxide permit visible light to pass through, but they effectively reflect infrared heat radiation back into the room." Low-e glass keep heat inside in winter and outside in summer. They also reflect damaging ultraviolet light, helping to protect interior furnishings from fading.
Some energy-efficient windows are filled with low-conductivity gas, such as argon, krypton, and yes, even CO2. These lower conductivity gases insulate better than regular air.
Tinted glass and tinted window films can further help to reduce solar gain by reflecting light back outside. Tinted glass has its limitations, however, as it tends to absorb some heat and reduces overall visibility, but may be an effective choice for certain applications or in certain areas.
Another factor to consider when purchasing windows is edge spacers. Edge spacers keep the window’s glass panes the correct distance apart. Traditionally, edge spacers were made of aluminum, a highly conductive material. In more recent years edge spacers made of foam, fiberglass and vinyl have been developed. These materials further reduce heat flow and prevent condensation.
If you are not ready to replace your existing windows, there are a number of inexpensive measures you can take to improve their performance:
More and more states are adopting renewable portfolio standards (RPS), also known as renewable electricity standards (RES). These standards require utilities to provide increasing amounts of electricity to consumers from renewable energy resources, like wind, solar and biomass. Congress is now considering passage of a national RPS, and it is only a matter of time before our energy policy shifts from over-reliance on coal, and the harmful effects of CO2 and other toxic air emissions, to investments that increase energy efficiency in homes, businesses and industry, and that develop the full potential of renewable energy resources, which produce little or no emissions and which, unlike fossil fuels, are limitless in supply.
At the same time, there are a number of options for using renewable energy at home. Some options, like generating electricity from small-scale wind turbines or solar photovoltaic panels, require larger up-front investments, but can result in large energy savings over time. Others options are relatively inexpensive and can achieve more immediate savings.
Recent advances in residential wind turbines make them more affordable and easier to use than ever before. "The proliferation of net metering laws [laws that allow homeowners to sell extra energy generated by wind and solar systems back to the utility], in about 40 states, as well as a growing number of state residential wind incentive programs, has given a strong boost to the small-scale wind turbine industry. . . . Many in the small-scale wind turbine industry think residential wind power is about to enter suburbia with simpler, less expensive systems that perform more like household appliances than complicated renewable energy systems. And the potential is enormous; it’s estimated there are at least 15 million homes with the resources necessary to make a wind installation effective."
Whether it makes sense to install a wind turbine in your back yard depends on variables such as your lot size, zoning restrictions, wind speeds in your area, the cost and amount of electricity you use, whether your utility offers net metering, and the availability of state rebates and incentives.
Solar photovoltaic (PV) systems are another option for using renewable energy to support your household electricity needs. The initial investment, while likely to be less expensive than small-scale wind, is still considerable, and may not be cost-effective in all settings, at least not at this time. "The most important factors for making solar an attractive investment include high electric rates, net-metering policies, financial incentives and good sunlight." The good news is that recent advances in technology are making solar PV systems more affordable and easier to install, and these trends are likely to continue.
Passive solar design is another renewable energy strategy, the costs for which are largely in your control depending on your budget. "The best aspect of solar design is that if you’re building or remodeling a home, you can incorporate it at little or no extra expense. With oil and natural gas prices rising, and power blackouts becoming more common, it now makes more sense than ever to take advantage of natural heating and cooling rather than depending on fossil fuels."
"A new home provides the best opportunity for designing and orienting the home to take advantage of the sun’s rays. A well-oriented home admits low-angle winter sun to reduce heating bills and rejects overhead summer sun to reduce cooling bills."
Another use of solar power is for heating water. "If you heat water with electricity, have high electric rates, and have an unshaded, south-facing location (such as a roof) on your property, consider installing a solar water heater. . . . More than 1.5 million homes and businesses in the United States have invested in solar water heating systems, and surveys indicate over 94% of these customers consider the systems a good investment. Solar water heaters are also good for the environment. Solar water heaters avoid the harmful greenhouse gas emissions associated with electricity production. During a 20-year period, one solar water heater can avoid over 50 tons of carbon dioxide emissions."
Buying green power from your utility is yet another alternative for supporting renewable energy without having to invest in equipment or ongoing maintenance. Virtually all utilities offer this option, including Indianapolis Power and Light (IPL), Duke Energy, and rural electric cooperatives that serve other portions of Indiana. Presently green power is purchased at a premium, but the additional cost is relatively small. IPL purchases its green power from a Minnesota wind farm and Indiana landfill gas generation plants. "At this premium, a typical residential customer using 1000 kilowatt-hours in a month and enrolled at the 100% level would pay an additional $1.91 on their IPL electric bill."
If your utility doesn’t offer green power purchasing options, consider buying "carbon credits." A number of organizations sell carbon credits, sometimes called renewable energy certificates, or RECs. With these programs, you can calculate how much CO2 you are responsible for and purchase credits to offset that amount. You can access these programs online by doing a search for "carbon offsets" or "carbon credits."
Carbon offsets are a "handy mechanism that allows us to convert our units of personal carbon emissions into dollars for wind farms, reforestation projects and other conscience-cleansing pursuits. The theory is that such investments cancel out the environmental harm we do by burning gasoline and living in warm, gadget-laden homes."
Even if you have actively taken steps to reduce your carbon dioxide footprint, through offsets you can reduce your footprint further, all the way to zero. “When you buy offsets, you essentially pay someone to reduce or remove global warming pollution in your name. For example, when you buy 10 tons of carbon offsets, the seller guarantees that 10 fewer tons of global warming pollution go into the atmosphere. While the pollution you produce yourself is the same, you get the credit for that 10-ton reduction."
Most of the offset companies on the market use third-party certification to provide accountability, so that when you buy carbon credits, you can be assured that they are paying for the renewable resources they are claiming to support, and eliminating the promised amount of greenhouse gas. "The certifying agencies evaluate offset projects on factors such as 'additionality' (whether the greenhouse-gas reduction would happen anyway) and 'double counting' (more than one stakeholder takes credit for the same project). But they don’t weigh in on which type of offset is best."
"Ultimately, the key to reducing carbon dioxide is to shift from using fossil fuels to using renewable energy (wind, solar, small hydro, biomass). This form of energy reduces not only CO2 emissions but also pollutants in the air. It may not be practical to set up a renewable energy source in your own home but you can purchase 'green power' from local electrical utility companies. While this mode of energy is currently a little more expensive . . . you can easily make up for the costs with the energy efficiency cost savings from other actions . . . This action is one of the most effortless ways to reduce your CO2 emissions."
References:

We can no longer afford to ignore global warming. Its consequences, including loss of life, economic disruption and population dislocation are growing each year. "As individuals living on the planet at this moment in time, we face a challenge no generation has ever had to face. We need to dramatically change the manner in which we use the Earth’s natural resources. And we need to do this soon or we will significantly increase the severity of climate-induced natural disasters."
The accumulation of greenhouse gases caused by everyday activities of modern life – driving our cars, heating and cooling our homes, and running our factories, is transforming our climate, acting like an extra blanket around the earth and trapping more heat than would otherwise be there. "Around the world, climate change is threatening not only individual species such as polar bears, tigers, salmon, penguins and corals, but it is also posing potentially catastrophic and long-term changes to the environment and people’s lives around the world."
"In addition to rising temperatures, climate change is resulting in sea level rise, increased hurricane intensity, glacier decline, increased drought, spread of disease, shifts in the timing of seasons, increased flooding, changes in freshwater supply, and an increase in extreme weather events."
References:
Many chemical compounds found in the Earth’s atmosphere act as "greenhouse gases." These include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, nitrous oxide and water vapor. These gases allow sunlight to enter the atmosphere freely. When sunlight strikes the Earth’s surface, some of it is reflected back towards space as infrared radiation (heat). Greenhouse gases absorb this infrared radiation and trap the heat in the atmosphere. Over time, the amount of energy sent from the sun to the Earth’s surface should be about the same as the amount of energy radiated back into space, leaving the temperature of the Earth’s surface roughly constant. However, as atmospheric levels of greenhouse gases increase, more heat is trapped in the Earth’s atmosphere than is radiated back into space, causing the temperature of the Earth’s surface to rise.
With the beginning of large-scale industrialization around 150 years ago, human activities have been dramatically adding to the carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. The burning of fossil fuels, such as coal and oil to power our cars, factories, businesses and homes, is increasing carbon dioxide beyond natural levels. According to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, "today’s rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, at 380 parts per million by volume, is already 27 percent higher than its highest recorded level during the last 650,000 years."
References:
In the last decade our understanding of climate change has vastly increased and the debate surrounding climate change has been settled. Notwithstanding the natural variability of the Earth’s climate, top scientists from all the major scientific bodies of the world are unanimous about this man-made phenomenon. They have stated unequivocally that global warming is occurring, and people are causing it by burning fossil fuels (like coal, oil and natural gas) and cutting down forests. All agree that we must take immediate action to avoid the most dire consequences of global warming.
The IPCC report went on to state that "[w]arming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level . . . Among its findings:
In terms of understanding and attributing climate change, the report stated that "[m]ost of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations. This is an advance since the TAR’s [Third Assessment Report’s] conclusion that 'most of the observed warming over the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations.' Discernible human influences now extend to other aspects of climate, including ocean warming, continental-average temperatures, temperature extremes and wind patterns . . ."

Energy-related carbon dioxide emissions from coal, petroleum and natural gas represent 82% of total U.S. human-made greenhouse gas emissions. Methane (from agriculture, landfills, coal mines, and oil and gas operations) represents another 9%. Nitrous oxide (emitted from burning fossil fuels and through the use of certain fertilizers and industrial processes) represents another 5% of total greenhouse gas emissions. Other human-made gases (released as byproducts of industrial processes and through leakage) account for another 2% of greenhouse gas emissions.
In summary, the science of global warming is clear. The only debate in the science community about global warming is about how much and how fast warming will continue as a result of heat-trapping emissions. Scientists have given a clear warning about global warming, and we have more than enough facts — about causes and fixes — to implement solutions right now.

Although the U.S. represents less than 5% of the world’s population, we produce about 25% of global carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels, primarily because we meet 85% of our energy needs through burning fossil fuels. Of the over 85% of energy the U.S. uses from fossil fuels, 40% comes from petroleum and about 23% each from coal and natural gas. Nuclear electric power accounts for another 8% of the U.S.’s total energy consumption. Despite America’s vast potential for energy from the sun, wind, crops and other renewable sources, renewable energy currently accounts for a mere 6% of our total energy use. In 2005, hydroelectric power accounted for just under half (45%) of the total energy from renewable resources, followed by wood, waste, geothermal, alcohol fuels, wind and solar.
"While most people associate global warming primarily with vehicle exhaust, electricity generation is the leading source of U.S. carbon dioxide (C02) emissions – the most important heat-trapping gas. Our coal plants already emit more CO2 than all our cars, SUVs, trucks, buses, boats, trains, and airplanes combined, and the U.S. Department of Energy projects that CO2 emissions from coal, if left unchecked, will increase an additional 52 percent by 2030 (compared with 2003 levels)." "About 40 percent of it is used to fuel power plants that supply electricity to power our homes, businesses and industry. Another 28 percent is used to power our transportation system, with most of that energy used to fuel personal cars, light trucks and SUVs. Industry directly consumers about 21 percent of our energy, not counting electricity produced from electric power plants and consumed by industrial facilities. Home and business energy consumption round out the picture."

Though a mere 7% of the energy the U.S. uses comes from the sun, wind, crops and other renewable resources, even less - only 1.5% - of Indiana’s energy is produced from renewable resources, most of that from biomass for ethanol blend in gasoline. Indiana ranks 15th in the nation in terms of state population; however, it ranks 4th in the nation in terms of the number of megawatt hours1 of electricity generated from coal as opposed to other energy sources (i.e., natural gas, petroleum, nuclear power, renewable resources), and 3rd in the nation in terms of the total number of megawatt hours of electricity generated from coal (surpassed only by Texas – ranked 2nd in the nation in terms of state population - and Ohio – ranked 7th in state population).
In terms of fossil fuel consumption for electricity generation, Indiana ranks 2nd in the nation in the number of short tons2 of coal consumed on an annual basis, surpassed only by Texas.
Combined, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin account for 20% of the carbon dioxide pollution in the United States and 5% of the world’s total pollution. Indiana is the 5th largest producer of carbon dioxide air emissions from electric power plants in the United States (122,094,588 metric tons), almost 95% of which is produced from burning coal. Texas ranks 1st in CO2 air emissions from electric power plants (258,660,697), Ohio 2nd (131,831,144), Florida 3rd (130,324,815), and Pennsylvania 4th (126,712,616).
In addition, Indiana ranks 3rd in the nation in terms of the number of metric tons of sulfur dioxide air emissions (responsible for fine particle pollution and acid rain - neighboring Ohio ranks 1st), and 4th in terms of the number of metric tons of toxic nitrogen oxides emitted into the atmosphere (responsible for acid rain and smog - neighboring Ohio ranks 2nd). Most alarming, Indiana ranks 1st in the nation for the amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person from all Indiana energy sectors.
Duke Energy’s contribution to greenhouse gas emissions in Indiana will grow by more than 3.5 million additional tons of CO2 per year should the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC) approve Duke Energy Indiana and Vectren’s petition to build a 630 megawatt (MW) Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle (IGCC) power plant in Edwardsport, Indiana.3 Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc., sister agency to the Citizens Action Coalition Education Fund, opposes construction of this plant, instead urging the IURC to direct Duke to begin investing in cleaner, more economic energy efficiency and renewable power alternatives.
38.4% of all CO2 air emissions in Indiana come from coal-fired power plants located in just five counties in Southwestern Indiana. This number increases to 42.9% when major natural gas-burning and industrial sources are included.4 Major sources of CO2 emissions in Central Indiana include Indianapolis Power & Light Company’s Harding Street coal-burning electric generation facility, which produces 3,687,128 tonnes5 of CO2 per year, Indianapolis-based industries including the Damler-Chrysler Corporation Foundry (5,486,660 tonnes/year) and the C.C. Perry K. Steam Plant (797,331 tonnes/year), Duke Energy-Noblesville’s natural gas-burning plant in Hamilton County (208,762 tonnes/year) and Steel Dynamics, Inc., (SDI) Bar Products natural gas-burning plant in Hendricks County (105,524 tonnes/year). Just under 10% of all CO2 air emissions in Indiana come from electric power plants and major industries in Lake, Porter and LaPorte Counties in Northwestern Indiana. Over 16% of all CO2 air emissions in Indiana come from electric generation facilities and major industries in Vermillion, Vigo and Sullivan Counties in West-Central Indiana.
1A megawatt hour is a measure of energy production or consumption equal to one million watts, or one thousand kilowatts, produced or consumed for one hour.
2A "short ton" is how the U.S. has historically measured units of coal. A short ton equals 2,000 pounds, and is equivalent to .90719 metric tons. Most other nations use metric units of measure.
3While the IGCC technology will reduce some emissions, it will increase others because it will be operating much more frequently than the power plants that will be shut down. Carbon dioxide emissions will increase by 785%; lead emissions by 14,555%; carbon monoxide emissions by 1,480%; particulate matter by 297%; and volatile organic compounds by 678%. Complete information on CAC’s opposition to the IGCC plant is available at www.citact.org.
4The counties are Pike, Gibson, Spencer, Warrick and Posey.
5A tonne refers to a metric unit of measurement in wide use outside the U.S. One metric tonne of CO2 equals 1.102 short tons.
"Today, the nation is facing a health crisis from power plant pollution. Every year power plants spew billions of tons of pollution into our air. Nationally, 50% of electricity comes from coal [roughly 95% in Indiana], but coal-fired power plants are responsible for the lion’s share of dangerous pollution from the electric power industry. Within the electric power industry, these plants generate:
According to a report by the Environmental Integrity Project (EIP), a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization established in March of 2002 by former EPA enforcement attorneys to advocate for more effective enforcement of environmental laws: "When the original Clean Air Act was passed in 1970, the electric utility industry persuaded Congress to not impose strict pollution controls on old power plants, because they would soon be replaced by newer state-of-the-art facilities. Yet despite the industry’s promises, many of the nation’s oldest and dirtiest power plants continue t